Registrations currently disabled due to excessive spam. Please email phreeqcusers at gmail.com to request an account.
Welcome
Guest
Forum Home
Login
Register
PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum
»
Processes
»
Dissolution and precipitation
»
Minerals supersaturated after defining as equilibrium
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Minerals supersaturated after defining as equilibrium (Read 2756 times)
peterwadeuk
Top Contributor
Posts: 54
Minerals supersaturated after defining as equilibrium
«
on:
27/02/17 10:53 »
Greetings good persons.
I am simulating the vadose zone of a soil column (excluding organic carbon for now).
Before tackling the kinetics (e.g. albite dissolves slowly), I am attempting to explore the system under the equilibrium assumption.
The input file I prepare is attached, and quoted after this text.
I find that when I run this model some of the minerals input as equilibrium solids do not dissolve, and report as supersaturated.
If I enter the minerals singly, they dissolve and saturation index is zero, as expected. It seems to be the combination of solids that is problematic.
I am clearly doing something wrong.
Please would someone point me in the right direction?
Thank you,
Peter
=================================================
TITLE Soil Layer 1 - Vadose zone
# Uses database file wateq4f.dat
PHASES
K-feldspar
KAlSi3O8 + 4H+ + 4H2O = Al+3 + 3H4SiO4 + K+
log_k 0.875
delta_h -12.467 kcal
Smectite-high-Fe-Mg
Ca.025Na.1K.2Fe.5Fe.2Mg1.15Al1.25Si3.5H2O12 + H+ = 3.5 H2SiO4-2 -2 H2O + 0.025 Ca+2 + 0.1 Na+ + 0.2 Fe+3 + 0.2 K+ + 0.5 Fe+2 + 1.15 Mg+2 + 1.25 Al+3
log_k -62.94
SOLUTION 1 Pore water from equilibrium with DI water in atmosphere
temp 25
pH 7
pe 4
redox pe
units mmol/kgw
density 1
Ca 0.00958125
Mg 0.00178985
Na 0.61334 charge
Cl 0.66852
S 0.01175765
Fe 0.001
Si 0.001
K 0.001
Al 0.001
-water 1 # kg
EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES 1
Albite 0 3.37 dissolve_only
Chlorite14A 0 1.75 dissolve_only
CO2(g) -3.5 10 dissolve_only
Hematite 0 1.11 dissolve_only
Illite 0 10.68 dissolve_only
K-feldspar 0 3.18 dissolve_only
Kaolinite 0 5.68 dissolve_only
O2(g) -0.678 10 dissolve_only
Quartz 0 120.5 dissolve_only
Smectite-high-Fe-Mg 0 1.97 dissolve_only
SELECTED_OUTPUT
-file phases.csv
-time false
-step true
-equilibrium_phases Albite Chlorite14A Quartz Kaolinite
Illite Hematite K-feldspar Smectite-high-Fe-Mg
-saturation_indices Albite Chlorite14A Quartz Kaolinite
Illite Hematite K-feldspar Smectite-high-Fe-Mg
Logged
dlparkhurst
Global Moderator
Posts: 4062
Re: Minerals supersaturated after defining as equilibrium
«
Reply #1 on:
27/02/17 15:33 »
If some minerals become supersaturated by dissolution of other minerals, you are not allowing the minerals to precipitate, so they are supersaturated. I don't see a problem with the program; it is doing what you asked.
Logged
peterwadeuk
Top Contributor
Posts: 54
Re: Minerals supersaturated after defining as equilibrium
«
Reply #2 on:
27/02/17 16:04 »
Thank you David.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum
»
Processes
»
Dissolution and precipitation
»
Minerals supersaturated after defining as equilibrium