PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum

Registrations currently disabled due to excessive spam. Please email phreeqcusers at gmail.com to request an account.
Welcome Guest
 

  • Forum Home
  • Login
  • Register

  • PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum »
  • Processes »
  • Dissolution and precipitation »
  • Effect of density in Saturation Index
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Effect of density in Saturation Index  (Read 597 times)

DFhidro

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 6
Effect of density in Saturation Index
« on: 04/12/24 19:27 »
Hi!

I'm calculating the saturation index for brine and noticed that I get very different values depending on whether I input the measured density or not when defining the solution.

These are my data:

Solution 1: 
- Units: mg/l 
- Density: 1.225 
- Cl: 217968 
- Na: 87431 

Solution 2: 
- Units: mg/l 
- Cl: 217968 
- Na: 87431 

When checking my output, the calculated density for Solution 2 is very similar to the density I use in Solution 1: 

Solution 2
- pH: 7.000 
- pe: 4.000 
- Specific Conductance (?S/cm, 25?C): 316867 
- Density (g/cm?): 1.20933 

But I get the following saturation indices:

Solution 1: 
- H2O(g): SI = -1.60, log IAP = -0.10, log K(298 K, 1 atm) = 1.50 
- Halite: SI = -0.21, log IAP = 1.37, log K(298 K, 1 atm) = 1.58 

Solution 2: 
- H2O(g): SI = -1.65, log IAP = -0.15, log K(298 K, 1 atm) = 1.50 
- Halite: SI = 0.24, log IAP = 1.82, log K(298 K, 1 atm) = 1.58 

Why are the saturation indices so different when I enter or do not enter the density?

I?m using Pitzer Database.

Thank you very much!
Logged

dlparkhurst

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4030
Re: Effect of density in Saturation Index
« Reply #1 on: 04/12/24 21:55 »
Look at the concentrations (mol/kgw) that are calculated.

For mg/L, first the density is used to calculate mol/kgs; then the mass of solutes is subtracted to determine the mass of water; and finally, mol/kgw are calculated.

When a density in not defined, a density of 1.0 is used. In your case, this makes a big difference in concentrations.

Probably best is to let PHREEQC adjust the density to that which, when entered in input would produce the calculated density in output. The advantage of this is that when you use the Basic functions RHO and SOLN_VOL, you will get back your original concentrations; otherwise there will be a difference between your input concentration (in mg/L) and if you calculate them in Basic (totmol("Cl")*gfw("Cl")*1000/soln_vol).

Code: [Select]
Solution 1
-Units mg/l
-Density 1.225
Cl 217968
Na 87431
END

Solution 1
-Units mg/l
#-Density 1.225
Cl 217968
Na 87431
END

Solution 1
-Units mg/l
-Density 1.225 calc
Cl 217968
Na 87431
END
Logged

  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
  • PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum »
  • Processes »
  • Dissolution and precipitation »
  • Effect of density in Saturation Index
 

  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2