Click here to donate to keep PhreeqcUsers open
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum Home
Login
Register
PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum
»
Processes
»
Oxidation and reduction equilibria
»
Fix_e- coupled with Calcite in equilibrium phases
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Fix_e- coupled with Calcite in equilibrium phases (Read 795 times)
paznativ
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 17
Fix_e- coupled with Calcite in equilibrium phases
«
on:
May 19, 2023, 08:12:09 AM »
Hi all
I am trying to understand if there is a way to prevent the pe drop while calcualting the CCPP of calcite on wastewater.
The solution has high ammonium conc, making the Eq. Phases reaction problematic as it reduce the CO2 into CH4, making the CCPP inaccurate.
i tried setting the Fix_e- with many redox species with no luck, it always changes the pH dramatically making the CCPP negative - which is inaccurate as the initial SI of calcite is positive.
any ideas?
solution speicification and the script is below
thank you all in advance
Paz
PHASES
Fix_e-
e- = e-
log_k 0
SOLUTION 1 Supernatant wastewater
temp 25
pH 7.6
pe 4
redox pe
units mg/l
density 1
Alkalinity 2550
Ca 51.6
Cl 130
F 20
K 24
Mg 45
N(-3) 600
Na 391.69
P 311
-water 1 # kg
EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES 1
calcite 0 10
Fix_e- -4 O2(g) 10
Logged
dlparkhurst
Top Contributor
Posts: 3716
Re: Fix_e- coupled with Calcite in equilibrium phases
«
Reply #1 on:
May 19, 2023, 04:01:35 PM »
If you have that much ammonia in your solution, I don't think you should try to make the pe higher. By fixing the pe, you are doing more harm than good. The ammonium will oxidize to N2 or NO3-, depending on the pe that you chose, which causes changes in pe and CCPP.
If you are considering the solution in a reducing environment, then just skip the pe adjustment.
If you are considering the effects of bringing this water to an oxidizing environment, then you should probably oxidize the N(-3) to N(5). Nitrification processes generally go from N(-3) to N(5).
If you want to make N(-3) inert, you can define it as Amm and use the Amm.dat database.
Finally, make sure you use the right units. Phreeqc.dat has N(-3) as N by default, Amm.dat uses NH3. If the you use the wrong gfw, there is a moderate difference, so use the right gram formula weight. These definitions would override the defaults.
Code:
[Select]
N(-3) 600 as NH3
or
Amm 600 as N
Logged
paznativ
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 17
Re: Fix_e- coupled with Calcite in equilibrium phases
«
Reply #2 on:
May 19, 2023, 06:57:50 PM »
Dear Dr. Parkhurst
Thank you once again for the fast and helpful reply.
this solved my problem
Best
Paz
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum
»
Processes
»
Oxidation and reduction equilibria
»
Fix_e- coupled with Calcite in equilibrium phases