PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum

Registrations currently disabled due to excessive spam. Please email phreeqcusers at gmail.com to request an account.
Welcome Guest
 

  • Forum Home
  • Login
  • Register

  • PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum »
  • Processes »
  • Reactive transport modelling »
  • Defining SURFACES and EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES in TRANSPORT with a stagnant zone
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Defining SURFACES and EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES in TRANSPORT with a stagnant zone  (Read 3823 times)

dvlassopoulos

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 4
Defining SURFACES and EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES in TRANSPORT with a stagnant zone
« on: 04/06/19 14:57 »
I am interested in simulating solute retardation due to adsorption in a dual porosity medium (e.g. in fractures vs matrix). Is it possible to define different SURFACE site densities, EXCHANGE sites, and/or EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES for the mobile cells and immobile cells in a transport simulation?
Logged

dlparkhurst

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4222
Re: Defining SURFACES and EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES in TRANSPORT with a stagnant zone
« Reply #1 on: 04/06/19 16:08 »
All cells are identified by index numbers: 1 to n for mobile, n+2 to 2n + 2 for first immobile, etc. You can put any reactant definition in a cell by using the appropriate number. So, yes, define SURFACE 1 for cell 1 and SURFACE n + 2 for the immobile cell next to cell 1. (I think I have the numbering right, but you can check).
Logged

dvlassopoulos

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 4
Re: Defining SURFACES and EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES in TRANSPORT with a stagnant zone
« Reply #2 on: 05/06/19 01:01 »
Many thanks for the quick reply, David. It wasn't entirely clear to me but makes sense. Dimitri
Logged

  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
  • PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum »
  • Processes »
  • Reactive transport modelling »
  • Defining SURFACES and EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES in TRANSPORT with a stagnant zone
 

  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2