Registrations currently disabled due to excessive spam. Please email phreeqcusers at gmail.com to request an account.
Welcome
Guest
Forum Home
Login
Register
PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum
»
Processes
»
Inverse modelling
»
Inverse modelling for surface water in laterite terrain
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Inverse modelling for surface water in laterite terrain (Read 2376 times)
Chinaechem
Contributor
Posts: 1
Inverse modelling for surface water in laterite terrain
«
on:
08/02/19 08:42 »
I want calculate the inverse model for surface water in laterite terrain. With the input file below, I can get 10 models with uncertainty of 0.7. Please is there anything I can do to reduce the uncertainty? I will be grateful for any help. Thanks in advance.
TITLE Simple inverse model calculation for surface water in Ni laterite terrain
SOLUTION 1
units mg/kgw
pH 7 charge
SOLUTION 2
units mg/kgw
pH 6.53
temp 27.2
Al 0.06
Ca 2.06
Cl 1.67
K 0.15
Mg 5.38
Mn 0.80
Ni 0.29
Na 0.96
Si 4.3
S(6) 6.34 as SO4
Fe 3.51
Phases
Pimelite
Ni3Si4O10(OH)2:H2O + 6.000 H+ = 3.00 Ni++ + 4.00 SiO2 + 5.00 H2O
log_k 11.46
INVERSE_MODELING 1
-solutions 1 2
-uncertainty 0.7
-balances
Alkalinity 1
-phases
Magnesite dissolve
Antigorite
Calcite precipe
Quartz
Halite
Goethite precipe
Sepiolite precipe
Gibbsite
Magnetite
Forsterite
Gypsum dissolve
Manganite dissolve
Pimelite dissolve
CO2(g)
-range
END
Logged
dlparkhurst
Global Moderator
Posts: 4034
Re: Inverse modelling for surface water in laterite terrain
«
Reply #1 on:
09/02/19 01:44 »
I ran your SOLUTION definition, and I got a 60 percent charge imbalance. To use inverse modeling, you really need to have an analysis that has better cation/anion balance. There should be some alkalinity at pH 6.5. Is it the predominant anion?
If you have other analyses or can re-analyze the the water, then you need to consider the source of each element. In particular, consider the anions. If bicarbonate is the predominant anion, there is a ready source from soil zone CO2 reacting with minerals. If Cl and SO4 are predominant, the source is not obvious. Gypsum and halite are evaporite minerals that not consistent with laterites, which presumably formed under high rainfall and rapid weathering. The low concentrations of SO4 and Cl indicate there are not large quantities of these evaporite minerals, which would generate high concentrations. So, if SO4 and Cl are the predominant anions in the solution, what is the ultimate source of Cl and SO4, precipitation?
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
PhreeqcUsers Discussion Forum
»
Processes
»
Inverse modelling
»
Inverse modelling for surface water in laterite terrain